Here’s the review of that one. We
have all read it, surely. It was a CBC book after all. And we all discussed it
at the meeting on the 27th of April. So I got to say what I had to
say about it there, which differed greatly from the other(s) who had read it
and others who are yet to. This is my chance, however, to have the last word,
and say what I liked about the book at a louder volume and, perhaps more
importantly, immediately after he/she/those who opined it was a meh book; to have a last word that will seal this book’s legacy forever.
It was good. Pretty damn good, in fact. Not as a book, and
certainly not as a novel, but as a read. Humourous, odd, hippie-ish, dry, and
minimal in its jokes’ punchlines, yet cultured and well-rounded enough to be
appreciated by those with a taste that has ever had anything in common with the
target audience (i.e. dirty Pacific Northwest hippies). For a guy like me,
brought up in the desert and a University of Arizona graduate (a character in
the book is likewise an alum) with a pretty thin, yet surprisingly strong (like
the root of a mesquite tree in its infancy), connexion to the Pacific Northwest
and all it has to offer – naturally, industrially, artistically, fundamentally,
and spiritually – this book’s author seemed to be a man after my own heart. Not
sure I like that phrase, but people know what it means and I cannot think of
one that replaces it that people will automatically recognize.
To begin with, the girl in the story is a character I can
fall in love with and not love, and I feel like she would be perfectly fine
with that. She is a magical flower-child with a beauty that is not to be
paralleled and a complete disregard for social norms. Not that I have a thing
for flower-child granola bitches, especially those that do not shave their pits
and think my hunting/fishing is somehow cruel, but everything about the girl’s
personality just sounded generally fun. She also copulates. Frequently. At a
Robert Heinlein character sort of pace (that’s the guy that delivers the quote
I love: “Better copulate than never”).
The book’s magician is a guy named John Paul (of course his
name is John Paul) Ziller. He has a baboon named Mon Cul. This turns into a bit
of a fable at the end, which is really the only part of the book that resembles
a plot and a storyline and a premise and a conclusion/resolution. It also kind
of reminds me of Karl Pilkington’s Monkey
News /OOOooh! CHIMPANZEETHATMonkeynews…. (TM Ricky Gervais)
The magician’s friend is an athlete who used to play
football for Duke University and can still beat the hell out of anyone, and his
mishap in falling into a violent order of monks within the catholic church is
also a plot-line that really ends up being the chief storyline and the reason
everything unfolds the way it does. And it is bizarre. But funny, at least to
me.
Then there is the interesting bit about the narrator. He has
experienced some of the story of which he writes, he is currently writing in a
state of crisis as the story has not completely unfolded, and the story
finishes with him recapping everything and bringing you to date in his current,
hellish situation. Which reminded me a bit of the style in which the narrator
recaps events in Pale Fire, the book
that inspired me to finally get this blog going. If you decide you might be
into stories that are written in that odd, rare,
fictional-memoire-yet-present-tense-at-the-end form, you may also enjoy A Time of Changes by Robert Silverberg.
Another thing I would like to say I found enjoyable in this
one is just how much use the characters believe there really is in a roadside
attraction. It reminded me of two books I have read that have heavy inputs from
roadside attractions: American Gods
by Neil Gaiman – a book about varying forms of mythology taking on what people
in today’s world worship; and Driving Mr.
Albert – a non-fiction book my brother recommended about the improbable
cross-country trip of Albert Einstein’s brain as it was returned to his family
by a somewhat comical coroner who almost resembles a janitor.
That may just be all I have to say on this book. Unless
someone else still has something to say about it, in which case I will respond
to that and make my comment the final say and that will be that. Pretty odd
book, overall, but I liked it.
No comments:
Post a Comment